Purify
TodayBiblePrayersSaints
Discover
CalendarCommunityShop
SupportAccount

The Bible

  • Old Testament
  • New Testament
  • Search

The Saints

  • The Saints
  • The Fathers
  • Writings

The Library

  • Reading
  • Discover
  • Councils
  • Topics
  • Heresies
  • Shop

The Calendar

  • Today
  • This month
  • Pascha
  • The fasts

The Prayer

  • Open today's prayer
  • Morning Rule
  • Evening Rule
  • The Jesus Prayer
  • Learn to Pray

About this work

  • About
  • Purify Plus
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • FAQ
  • Support the work
  • What's new
  • Account

Find us

Discord@purifymylife@purify.app@purifymylife
Language
Purify

Glory to God for all things.

© 2026 · 1.3 · Public-domain texts unless otherwise noted.

‹

Scholia on the Incarnation of the Only-Begotten

Saints›St. Cyril of Alexandria›Scholia on the Incarnation of the Only-Begotten

St. Cyril of Alexandria

Scholia on the Incarnation of the Only-Begotten

A short Christological handbook on the union of natures

Contents4 sections▾
  1. 1The name Emmanuel
  2. 2The Word who is from the Father
  3. 3The flesh which is the Word's own
  4. 4The single Person and the communicatio idiomatum
01

The name Emmanuel

Cyril begins the Scholia with the name given by the prophet Isaiah: Emmanuel, which is translated, 'God with us'. The name is the doctrine in compact form. The One who is now with us is God, and the manner of His being with us is by having taken our nature to Himself. To say Emmanuel is to confess in a single word the two truths the heretics divide: that He who is with us is truly God, and that He is truly with us in our flesh.

Cyril notes that the Septuagint, the version received in the Church, names the Child 'God with us' before His birth. The name is not given on account of moral indwelling; it is given to the Person who is being conceived in the Virgin. The prophet's word forbids the Nestorian reading from the very beginning.

Notes

  • The Scholia is a short work, almost a teacher's syllabus on the Incarnation, written for clergy who needed concise definitions to use in catechesis after Ephesus.
  • Cyril's argument from the prophets is characteristic. He reads the Old Testament as already speaking of the Person of the incarnate Word.
02

The Word who is from the Father

Cyril gives the eternal half of the doctrine first. The Word is from the Father, of one essence with Him, before all ages. He is not made; He is not adopted; He is not a creature elevated to divine status. He is what the Father is, except that He is Son and the Father is Father. The relations differ; the essence is one.

This eternal Sonship is the precondition of the Incarnation. The One who takes flesh in the Virgin's womb is not a new person who comes into being there; He is the eternal Son who, without ceasing to be what He was, becomes what He was not.

Notes

  • Cyril's formulation 'without ceasing to be what He was, He became what He was not' is repeated almost word-for-word in the festal verses of the Nativity and Theophany.
  • The eternal generation is from the Father alone; the temporal generation is from the Virgin alone. Cyril keeps the categories rigorously distinct.
03

The flesh which is the Word's own

Cyril names the flesh of Christ as the Word's own flesh: not a flesh externally connected to Him, not a man with whom He has come to dwell, but the flesh which He has made His own by personal union. The flesh is animated by a rational soul, complete in everything proper to humanity, taken in its entirety from the Virgin without seed.

Cyril is careful: in saying that the flesh is the Word's own, he does not mean that the flesh becomes divine in essence. The flesh remains flesh; the divinity remains divinity. The union is in the Person of the Word, who, having made the flesh His own, does in it everything that He does, divine and human alike.

Notes

  • Cyril's formula 'one incarnate nature of the Word of God' (mia physis tou Theou Logou sesarkomene), which appears in the Scholia and elsewhere, was later misappropriated by the Monophysites. The Council of Chalcedon (451) clarified that Cyril's meaning was the personal union, not the confusion of natures.
  • The integrity of the human nature, body and rational soul, became a fixed point of the Catholic faith after Apollinarius. Cyril repeats it in nearly every paragraph of his Christology.
04

The single Person and the communicatio idiomatum

Cyril sets out the rule of the communication of idioms: what is proper to either nature in Christ may be said of the one Person, because the one Person is the subject of both natures. The Virgin bears in the flesh the One who is God; the immortal God dies on the Cross in His own flesh; the One who hungers in the wilderness is the One who feeds creation. Each of these statements is true, because the subject of both verbs is the same Person.

Cyril warns against the misuse of the rule. To say that God died in the flesh is not to say that the divine nature suffered. To say that Mary bore God is not to say that her flesh contributed to the divinity. The rule does not mix the natures; it names the one Person who holds them both.

Notes

  • The communicatio idiomatum is the technical name for the rule Cyril here states. It is the grammar of orthodox Christology and is presupposed by every paragraph of patristic preaching after Ephesus.
  • The Scholia closes with a series of test statements and their proper interpretations, of the kind a candidate for ordination might have been asked to expound. The work was made to be used.

Source: Summarized from the Library of Fathers translation by P. E. Pusey (Oxford, 1881), public domain. Editorial framing and notes by the editors of Purify.